tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post2154172067807617803..comments2022-12-11T03:00:22.937-08:00Comments on Radio Free: Drum roll please ...RadioFreehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00670332792227389936noreply@blogger.comBlogger164125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-11649035714120521952009-04-10T18:03:00.000-07:002009-04-10T18:03:00.000-07:00Hmm, only slightly? I think his comments prove oth...Hmm, only slightly? I think his comments prove otherwise. Definitely a whack job.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-21153933720053783692009-04-09T00:18:00.000-07:002009-04-09T00:18:00.000-07:00Hi, Keri and/or Keri's baby daddy! Did you know th...Hi, Keri and/or Keri's baby daddy! Did you know that Google has this awesome feature where you can actually login with your user account instead of posting anonymously? It's true! It's OK to come out of the anonymous hugbox to diss your e-enemies!Roger Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14308664674325717623noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-75737063572064043422009-04-08T14:00:00.000-07:002009-04-08T14:00:00.000-07:00Roger Williams is alive, I thought or at least was...Roger Williams is alive, I thought or at least was hoping he had died. He's only slightly less crazy than Chartier. Slightly.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-16845288754394440072009-04-08T02:17:00.000-07:002009-04-08T02:17:00.000-07:00ZOMFG, the drama! The unspeakable, as alleged by t...ZOMFG, the drama! The unspeakable, as alleged by the unemployable! And the baby daddy playing <A HREF="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/White_knight" REL="nofollow">white knight</A>? Classic!<BR/><BR/>Left unexamined: whether or not Krod was sent packing when her ratings went the way the most left of center talk shows have gone around the rest of the country (ie, down the drain). The outpouring of butthurt she's venting on her former employers, replacements, and everyone who isn't helping her in the hugbox? I definitely could have seen <I>that</I> coming.<BR/><BR/>HINT TO UNINITIATED: This would be much easier for our heroine to win if<BR/><BR/>1) the burden of proof weren't on her<BR/><BR/>2) it weren't so easy for her alleged antagonists to show that the hinges on the ol' door were never that tight to begin with<BR/><BR/>That said, do keep everyone in the entire world informed of the details of what is sure to be the grittiest 20 minutes of legal action in the history of the Commonwealth.Roger Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14308664674325717623noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-33773460969508462322009-03-05T06:05:00.000-08:002009-03-05T06:05:00.000-08:00By Sean BurkePublisherPosted Mar 05, 2009 @ 12:01 ...By Sean Burke<BR/>Publisher<BR/>Posted Mar 05, 2009 @ 12:01 AM<BR/>Last update Mar 05, 2009 @ 05:44 AM<BR/><BR/><BR/>Editor's Note: The following is an open letter to the ownership and management of WSAR.<BR/><BR/>I’ve just had the unpleasant experience of listening to your most recent WSAR editorial, and am compelled to respond. I did not think for a moment that you could, or would, go to such depths. I am thoroughly disappointed.<BR/><BR/>The hypocrisy displayed within that editorial is nothing short of stunning. To question the honesty and integrity of this newspaper, and its publisher personally, while you have degenerated your station, and our shared responsibilities to public service and the First Amendment, to nothing more than the public relations wing of the Correia Administration is abominable. To call into question the freedom of speech and free flow of opinion and ideas expressed within our online commenting feature as cowardly, while running (and profiting from) a station that has built its predominant programming model on a similar anonymous call-in format is yet more stunning. And to further question our fairness while never, in my memory, having allowed a rebuttal to a single one of your editorials or a conflicting opinion in contrast to your own to be aired on your station is most telling. The contradictions and hypocrisy are palpable. <BR/><BR/>You have worked hard, despite fundamental tenets of journalism that should compel you otherwise, to make these issues about the newspaper. This is not about the newspaper; this is about this administration. Reporting facts and editorializing on key events is not the cause of discord in our community … a classic “shoot the messenger” stance. This administration is responsible for its actions, or inactions, as the case may be. It is a responsibility that includes acceptance of the applause or criticism those actions elicit. <BR/><BR/>Your motives are quite clear and obvious: Implicate the newspaper to discredit and undermine our coverage to deflect attention from an administration that has mismanaged at almost every opportunity. It simply won’t work. This strategy significantly underestimates the perseverance of this newspaper and, more importantly, the intelligence of the residents of Fall River.<BR/><BR/>This newspaper has consistently reported within its news pages in a fair, balanced and objective manner … all duly noted by the mayor himself. And we will continue to do so. The newspaper also, simultaneously, offers well-researched, well-articulated and respectable support and/or criticism, as appropriate, through its appropriately labeled opinion pages, along with an open invitation for ongoing discussion and debate. <BR/><BR/>This journalism and opinion, respectively and separately, are fundamental missions of all media dedicated to public service and constructive discourse, all enabled through the First Amendment. These distinctions between news and opinion are a difference your editorials about this newspaper fail to recognize or about which you are ignorant. These are important responsibilities that we will not abandon, despite your best efforts to distract us. If this community’s political leaders are unaccustomed to accountability and criticism, I cannot apologize for that. It’s why the media exists.<BR/><BR/>It is not the newspaper’s (or radio station’s, for that matter) job to be a cheerleader for the government. That is a dereliction of your journalistic responsibility to the communities you serve. Our job is to inform citizens (and the electorate) of how well, or poorly, the government is handling the affairs of the people — affairs that have been delegated by the people to this administration. An informed citizenry makes our very democratic system work. In your absence, we will continue to fulfill this responsibility on behalf of both of us.<BR/><BR/>Your station and its talent have consistently sniped at this newspaper, most often, disingenuously through knowingly dispersing misinformation. That’s all well and good, I suppose, in a competitive media marketplace (only you choose the manner in which you wish to compete). But to offer such hypocrisy-laced charges against my, and this newspaper's, integrity and honesty is far less than I would ever have expected from you. Despite our previously respectful professional disagreements, I would not, nor could not, do likewise to you.<BR/><BR/>The Herald News has been steadfast in its determination not to engage with WSAR in the petty sniping that has defined the purposeful assault on this newspaper’s reputation to date. But when you decide to call into question the integrity of an 135-year-old institution, its journalistic commitment, its dedicated employees, the community it serves and the very democratic ideals for which it stands, that, WSAR, is out of bounds and will not go unaddressed. With that, we consider this issue closed and will return to our duties and obligations to news and to our readers. No more need be said. <BR/><BR/>I’m truly sorry that you’ve taken your cause to these unseemly levels. I know you are better people than this.<BR/><BR/>Respectfully,<BR/>Sean Burke<BR/>Publisher<BR/>The Herald NewsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-31234151242482847072009-03-04T10:52:00.000-08:002009-03-04T10:52:00.000-08:00Keri, I miss your voice of reason and (in)sanity ...Keri, I miss your voice of reason and (in)sanity on the radio. I wish you well in your case and offer up all my moral support!!<BR/><BR/>Leo from The CapeUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13388868760071444430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-82336037300468609152009-03-03T08:28:00.000-08:002009-03-03T08:28:00.000-08:00and i know you do or you wouldn't be here.and i know you do or you wouldn't be here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-82377381804447668922009-03-03T08:27:00.000-08:002009-03-03T08:27:00.000-08:00Please, i'm begging you all to go to JC's blog. I...Please, i'm begging you all to go to JC's blog. I know he thinks he's going to get people checking it out becuse of the all the hits here, but it's just not happening. His "show"is so bad it's good and i'd like to see it continue. So please, do it for me. If you enjoy the unstable as much as i do, you won't be sorry.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-13159607460162425762009-03-03T05:48:00.000-08:002009-03-03T05:48:00.000-08:00and you too, you are nuts too...and you too, you are nuts too...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-8182830347578172872009-03-03T00:50:00.000-08:002009-03-03T00:50:00.000-08:00I personally think you are all nuts. Each and ever...I personally think you are all nuts. Each and every one of you!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-24616625730464000522009-03-03T00:36:00.000-08:002009-03-03T00:36:00.000-08:00Speaking of not needed.... John Chartier, he's not...Speaking of not needed.... John Chartier, he's not needed and unnecessary but you know he's going to respond, for a crazy person he can be downright predictable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-72128968614534907652009-03-02T19:59:00.000-08:002009-03-02T19:59:00.000-08:00What the hell are you talking about 7:10PM? lol. T...What the hell are you talking about 7:10PM? lol. The funniest thing which we have all proven is the fact that Keri is worthless to her own blog. She hasn't posted in a month and we are having no problem at all keeping each other entertained. She's not needed on the radio and she doesn't even appear to be needed on her own blog! I find that incredibly amusing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-9591330503218069072009-03-02T19:10:00.000-08:002009-03-02T19:10:00.000-08:00"MAD enough," you mean, John. A crazyman's admissi..."<I>MAD</I> enough," you mean, John. A crazyman's admission of craziness is neither justification nor mitigation. You've cried "Wolf!" You've cried "Sheep!" Now, no one listens.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-35752510999019442022009-03-02T14:20:00.000-08:002009-03-02T14:20:00.000-08:00Oh... I never said that I wasn't crazy. But I'm ma...Oh... I never said that I wasn't crazy. But I'm man enough to admit it. ;-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-19281183200078654202009-03-02T14:16:00.000-08:002009-03-02T14:16:00.000-08:00"Crazy" did come back, his name is John Chartier....."Crazy" did come back, his name is John Chartier...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-76152073077218386222009-03-02T13:19:00.000-08:002009-03-02T13:19:00.000-08:00Not bothered at all. Despite what you said, I knew...Not bothered at all. Despite what you said, I knew you wouldn't stay away because you can't, and you're apparently not a man of you word.<BR/><BR/>Welcome back, I guess.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-89417792692820949662009-03-02T12:53:00.000-08:002009-03-02T12:53:00.000-08:00Relax. I just stopped by to see if "crazy" came ba...Relax. I just stopped by to see if "crazy" came back. I told keri I would stop posting if she wanted me to. But she didn't respond. So I guess she isn't all that bothered by me. So perhaps you shouldn't be so bothered either.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-11133082205342904222009-03-02T11:18:00.000-08:002009-03-02T11:18:00.000-08:00On February 21, 2009, at 11:40 PM, John Chartier s...On February 21, 2009, at 11:40 PM, John Chartier said:<BR/><BR/>"I'm out of here. ... IT REALLY IS OVER."<BR/><BR/>But I guess he can't stay away. Still trolling for readers?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-32651462651808840632009-03-02T04:00:00.000-08:002009-03-02T04:00:00.000-08:00Are you people still fighting?Feel free to go over...Are you people still fighting?<BR/>Feel free to go over to my Blog. I just kicked off my new show this past week. Perhaps it will entertain you while you are waiting for more Keri drama to happen.<BR/><BR/>http://studiocenter.blogspot.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-60775360025960673372009-03-01T19:27:00.000-08:002009-03-01T19:27:00.000-08:00Oh for crying out loud people--GROW THE F*CK UP!! ...Oh for crying out loud people--GROW THE F*CK UP!! Calling people names and making fun of them because of a speech impediment or because of the way they look is childish and absolutely ridiculous. No wonder people think that all of us who post on blogs are mental midgits.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-55069929584220761242009-03-01T14:11:00.000-08:002009-03-01T14:11:00.000-08:00you mean the radio huffer, duh duh duh weaze ,you mean the radio huffer, duh duh duh weaze ,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-85168254860100885252009-02-28T15:34:00.000-08:002009-02-28T15:34:00.000-08:00im glad that this heffer isnt posting anymoreim glad that this heffer isnt posting anymoreAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-11011878974891261362009-02-28T08:48:00.000-08:002009-02-28T08:48:00.000-08:00Are you kiding me? Big Bucks? WSAR and the words B...Are you kiding me? Big Bucks? WSAR and the words Big Bucks don't go together. Nobody at that station has ever made big bucks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-5339218183209347632009-02-28T07:13:00.000-08:002009-02-28T07:13:00.000-08:00wow 15k so herren is making big bucks too huh?wow 15k so herren is making big bucks too huh?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6247009258255925821.post-44162357887849180052009-02-28T02:06:00.000-08:002009-02-28T02:06:00.000-08:00I was the biggest Keri supporter in the past. Howe...I was the biggest Keri supporter in the past. However after reading up on all the bad treatment she has put people though on that radio info forum, I think I'm done here. <BR/><BR/>Signing off,<BR/><BR/>A Former FanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com